Should I date or marry someone who is IFB
Q: Im dating a IBF man. What concerns are there that I meed to consider, to determine if I shouldnt marry him.
Does his church [and himself] strongly "criticize" or do they "embrace" Gothard’s teachings? If they reject his teachings, that's better. If they embrace it... run! Thats still nor a simple cut and dry situation though, cuz many IFB churches embrace it, and IFB has concerning cult like issues.
The problems with IFB... well... to understand we have to look at a few things, to help bring counsel, guidance & clarity to the issue, in your sitiation. Please go through and understsnd these things well, and the resources below too. And after, please pray about it well, seeking God's guidance before you make a decision. A form of love towards someone doesnt mean theyre the right person for you. God may have had them in your life temporarily to lead you back or to Christianity. Not to tie you to "him".
False teachings of IBLP are closely connected to the Independent Fundamentalist Baptist (IFB) world, but they are not the same thing. Yet usually do get tied together, (between the two, to one another, by both groups). It def traps women in those churches, and leads to many problems including abuse, lamemt, loss of Christian faith, hopelessness, etc.
We need to look at the clear relationship, before discussing IFB, cultists issues, and whether you should pursue or end the relationship.
1. What Independent Fundamentalist Baptists (IFB) Are.
Independent Fundamentalist Baptist movement refers to a loose network of Baptist churches that emphasize:
• Independence from denominations
• Literal interpretation of The Bible
• Conservative theology
• Evangelism and personal salvation
• Often focuses on and doesnt allow reading if any other version but the King James Version of the Bible
Key traits:
• Each church is autonomous
• There is no central authority
• Pastors run their own churches
• Beliefs can vary widely
Some IFB churches are simply very conservative Baptists, while others can be extremely strict or authoritarian.
2. What IBLP Is
The Institute in Basic Life Principles (IBLP) is a parachurch ministry founded by Bill Gothard.
A parachurch organization means:
• It is not a church
• It operates alongside churches
• People from different denominations can join
IBLP provided:
• seminars
• homeschooling programs
• training materials
• youth programs like Advanced Training Institute (ATI)
*Which teaches their wonky views.
Many IFB families joined these programs. And it really messes up families, faith, brings distress and suffering.
3. Why People associate IFB with IBLP
->>>They overlap culturally. 🙁
Many followers of IBLP came from:
• IFB churches
• IFB & similar homeschooling families
Examples include the Duggar family who became famous on 19 Kids and Counting.
○Nothing wrong with homeschooling, or godly families.
Even though:
• Many IFB churches are not part of IBLP
• Some IFB pastors strongly criticize Gothard’s teachings.
... You dont really know which IFB churches are tied to Gothard's teachings. And might find yourself in one unaware.
4. Why Christians Criticize Both groups (but Differently)
They usually raise two separate concerns.
With IBLP
They argue it adds extra-biblical systems, such as:
• “umbrella of authority”
• spiritual formulas for success
• generational curse ideas [it is total nonsense]
With Some IFB Churches
The criticism is usually:
• legalism [the opposite of Grace].
• strict cultural rules treated like doctrine
• sometimes authoritarian pastors
But again — this varies widely among IFB churches.
5. Key Difference in One Sentence
IFB = a broad type of Baptist church movement.
IBLP = a teaching ministry that heavily influences many IFB churches & families.
The teaching says:
• God gives protection only under authority
• If you step outside authority (parents, husband, pastor), you lose protection
• Even if the authority is wrong, you should remain under it.
Why Christians Criticize This
Pastors say:
• The Bible never teaches a spiritual protection hierarchy like this
• It can allow leaders to control people or discourage questioning
• It can keep victims under abusive authority
2. Grace vs Rule Systems.
Examples included rules about:
• clothing and modesty
• music styles
• homeschooling
• dating vs courtship
• authority structures
• avoiding certain cultural influences
These were often presented as universal biblical principles. 😬
Accurate Criticism
Critics of it say it can turn Christianity into a formula:
Obey the principles → God will bless you
Break them → God will punish you
Many pastors say this confuses the gospel with behavior management.
3. Cause of Suffering
Christian Teaching
The Bible teaches suffering can happen for many reasons:
• living in a fallen world
• persecution
• God’s purposes we don’t understand
Example:
• Job shows suffering that was not caused by personal sin.
Gothard Teaching
Gothard frequently taught that problems like:
• illness
• financial hardship
• family problems
might come from:
• hidden sin
• generational sin [baloney]
• failure to follow biblical principles
Why Christians Rightly Criticize this
It:
• can lead to blaming victims
• oversimplifies suffering
• contradicts many biblical examples
• cause much suffering and turmoil
4. Handling of Abuse.
Christian Teaching:
Most churches today teach:
• abuse is sin and crime
• victims should be protected
• the church shepherds/counselors should be involved.
• [If necessary] authorities should be involved
Based partly on Romans 13, which teaches that governments punish wrongdoing.
And based in Scriptures teaching of handling sin (like abuse/crume) in the church.
It cant be handled biblically by shepherds nor rightly by government involvement if abuse and crime happen in a cult like church.
Gothard-Influenced Practice
Former members claim that in some IBLP circles:
• abuse was handled internally (by their rules)
• victims were encouraged to forgive and submit (even if it was wrong & repentance and correction if the offender wasnt genuine, nor required by leadership).
• reporting to police was discouraged (cuz it sheds light on abuse in that church, and i5 doesn't protect men who are abusers... it gets dealt with).
These issues became widely discussed after the scandals involving Josh Duggar, whose family appeared on 19 Kids and Counting. While decent people are trying to live life biblically, they made errors or followed IFB or Gothard methods, it failed cuz they were following false/bad leaders from within that sect on how to deal with it. It wasnt based on biblical methods and biblical counseling. Also, not everyone who claims to be saved, is. Some degenerate people are false converts who can decieve into adulthood, play along (religion) in cult like groups, until it gets exposed, as it did in Josh's case. We prayed he genuinely gets saved. And God uses this and the sisters departure from IFB & Gothard teachings into biblical Christianity, as testimony of God's transforming power, and with hope that many ithers trapped in that cult like sect flee it, while helping prevent others from joining it.
5. Leadership Structure
Christian Teaching:
Most churches use shared leadership, such as:
• elders
• pastors
• church accountability
Leaders are not supposed to be unquestionable.
Gothard Teaching:
IBLP functioned largely under the authority of Bill Gothard himself.
Critics say:
• his teachings were treated as authoritative interpretations
• questioning the system was discouraged
• there was little accountability
If churches held to that teaching, there is no leway nor hope for congregant women, nor hope for justice & true restoration, nor to correction to biblical values in ither areas.
Why Many Regard it as a Cult or “Cult-Like”
Many Christians hesitate to call it a full cult because followers still believe basic Christian doctrines (God, Jesus, salvation).
However, critics say the system had cult-like traits, such as:
• strong authority control
• extra-biblical teachings
• isolation from outside influence
• heavy loyalty to a leader
Are enough to label it a cult.
✅ Short summary
Christian teaching:
• Scripture alone is the final authority
• Salvation and blessing come through grace
• Leaders are accountable
• Suffering isn’t always caused by sin
You might say wait the umbrella image looks biblical 🤔. The Left side.
That’s a very good observation — and this is exactly where the debate happens among Christians. Many people see Gothard’s chart and think “that looks biblical.” The issue critics raise is not that authority exists, but how Gothard defined and applied it.
Let’s compare carefully.
1. Authority in the Bible (Christian Teaching)
Christians broadly agree the The Bible teaches real authority structures.
Examples often cited:
• Family authority
• Ephesians 5–6
• Husbands lead families, parents guide children.
• Church leadership
• Hebrews 13:17 — respect church leaders.
• Government authority
• Romans 13 — civil authorities have God-given roles.
So Christians do believe authority exists.
2. What Gothard Added
The issue Christian critics rightly raise is the specific doctrine created by Bill Gothard through the Institute in Basic Life Principles.
Gothard’s teaching went further than normal Christian doctrine in several ways:
1️⃣ Protection depends on staying under authority
Gothard taught that if someone leaves their authority (father, husband, pastor), they leave God’s “umbrella of protection.”
Many pastors say the Bible never teaches spiritual protection works like a chain of command.
2️⃣ Submission even when authority is wrong
Gothard often taught that:
• Even if an authority is unfair or sinful, a person should remain under them.
Critics point out that the Bible gives limits to authority.
Example:
• Acts 5:29
“We must obey God rather than men.”
So Christian teaching generally says:
• submit to authority unless it requires sin.
3️⃣ Direct relationship with God
Christian theology emphasizes that believers relate to God directly through Christ.
Example:
• 1 Timothy 2:5 — Jesus is the mediator.
Critics say Gothard’s system can function like a spiritual chain of intermediaries.
3. Where Gothard Is Biblical
To be fair, some parts of the idea do come from Scripture, such as:
• respecting parents
• honoring leaders
• family structure
• discipline and order
That’s why the teaching seems convincing to many Christians at first.
4. Where Christians Say, No It Goes Too Far
Many pastors say the diagram oversimplifies and exaggerates biblical authority.
Problems they highlight:
• it turns authority into a spiritual protection system
• it discourages questioning leaders
• it can trap people under abusive authority
• it implies God’s protection comes through humans rather than directly from God
5. A Simple Comparison
Image
✅ In short:
Many Christians agree that authority is biblical, but they argue Gothard turned it into a rigid spiritual system the Bible doesn’t actually teach.
If you want, I can also show you something interesting: how Gothard’s umbrella teaching actually differs from the historic teachings of Baptists, Reformed churches, and even early Christians. It’s a subtle difference but really important.
====
On legalism issues
The accusation of “legalism” toward the Independent Fundamentalist Baptist movement (IFB) usually comes from Christians who believe some IFB churches turn personal standards into spiritual requirements. Not every IFB church does this, but critics say it happens often enough to be a common concern (of that denomination).
Below is the typical Christian critique of IFB legalism.
1. What Christians Mean by “Legalism”
In Christian theology, legalism means adding human rules to God’s commands or implying that keeping those rules makes someone more righteous before God.
The concern usually comes from passages like:
• Galatians — warning against adding requirements to the gospel
• Colossians 2:20–23 — warning about man-made religious rules
Christians across many traditions agree that salvation comes through grace, not rule-keeping.
2. Typical Rules in Some IFB Churches
Many IFB churches promote strict lifestyle standards meant to encourage holiness. But its required, not a freedom in Christ choice.
Common examples:
Appearance
• men must have short hair
• women should not cut their hair
• women should wear skirts or dresses only
Entertainment
• no secular music
• no movie theaters
• strict limits on television or internet
Alcohol
• total abstinence (even though the Bible mainly condemns drunkenness)
Dating
• strict courtship systems
•
Bible translation
• insistence on the King James Version as the only legitimate English Bible
○ which is total nonsense.
* tbvh the Christian Bible of Protestants was the Geneva Bible. KJV was Catholic. Well he cut away from Carholicidm at some point snd created Anglicanism, but its mostly heavily Catholic (even to today). We only had KJV overtake Geneva ver in US cuz when British came here (after Puritans and pilgrams), they imposed British laws b4 our Independence. Only KJV was allowed to be bought, and the crown made it so cheap people started buying it over Geneva. Not by choice. Today's KJVOnly cultists dont even know this, nor how much better modern translations are (like LSB21 and NASB95).
3. Why Christians Criticize Their rules as Legalism.
Rule → Spiritual Judgment
Critics say the problem arises when these preferences become moral tests.
Example criticism:
A Christian who drinks a glass of wine or listens to contemporary music might be treated as spiritually compromised.
○ The Bible does not explicitly forbid those things.
○the church might wrongly discipline them.
Culture vs Command
Many pastors argue some IFB rules come from mid-20th-century American culture, not biblical commands.
For example:
• movie theaters were historically associated with immoral films
• certain music styles were linked to rebellion.
Critics say those cultural concerns became permanent religious rules. Not guides. Not calls to consider sin in your life, but strict required adherence to it.
4. Important: IFB Is Not One Group
Because IFB churches are independent:
• some are very strict
• some are moderately conservative
• some are nearly indistinguishable from other Baptist churches
There is no central authority controlling them. This is problematic.
On IFB Pastors (hierarchy)
They have similarities to other Baptist churches.
Independant churches, like many Southern Baptists & other independent churches, just as Non Denomination churches, have a single pastor. It is actually not good to have that leadership. Ill explain in a minute. All these churches have either one pastor and under him are decons who serve the church. Some have a Senior and Associate pastor with Decons also.
Two issues here
1. Scripture calls for a plurality of elders. Who are elders? They are pastors.
Yes some SBC churches have a Senior pastor and associate pastor. They might have a youth pastor, Evangelism pastor, etc. But there should be a plurality.
The reason it didn't work in many churches in US, is church averages were 30 to 75 people. Even less in the early wild west (and earlier). They cant afford 3 or 5 paid pastors. But as towns grow, as cities form, small likeminded churches should have merged into larger 4k member churches. And have multiple elders. They haven't done that in modern times. And pastors should be trained up from within the church, not be some college graduate who just gets hired. They know hardly nothing about the pastor nor his past. But if he grew up in the church, they know a ton about him, intimately know him, his character, his faith growth, his beliefs, his sins & flaws, his trustworthiness & integrity. This is the failing of independent churches. The leaders, esp pastor, wants a position with power and praise. Not to be submitted to God and faithfully shepherd & transparently.
2. What happens when theres only 1 pastor? A. In weak churches (or ones with small numbers, that need a pastor & cling to him cuz they have a hard time finding one) the church might cater to him instead of hold him equally accountable (to a holy life & to integrity as pastor). If multiple pastors are not at the church, he can do what he wants, live in sin, wrongly judge others, abuse of power and abuse congregants. Many pastors today are not evrn saved. And of the pastors in churches only 34% say they agree the Bible is the Authority in all areas of life and Faith. So if the 66% of the rest don't, they dont teach Scripture authoritatively! Which means they inject their own idolatrous views in what they preach and teach. And if its a one man show... theres no one to also hold that pastor accountable to biblical orthodoxy. This is the big problem of independant churches.
At least with SBC (which isnt actually a denomination, theyre independent churches), they hold to a set of agreed to biblical truths, and those are expected to be taught. If not the church can vote to fire the pastor, and if a weak church, that clings to that pastor anyway, SBC can boot them out. Disassociate with, publicly spotlight them, expose snd warn people to have nothung to do with them. All associations they had together are immediately cut off. No nearby SBC churches nor state SBC churches will do anything with them in any way anymore [incl, Evangelism, children activities, fellowships, conferences, moral connections in political or culture areas like pregnancy crisis centers etc) cuz they've left biblical truth. We wont tie light to darkness.
B. For the churches that arent weak, they will fire a solo pastor.
C. But if the "church" claims to be Christian, like some so called "non denom" church, even ones created by one guy... he "owns" the building, (who also might give his wife some title in the church that she has no right to, biblically), who started a church as a business but the congregants are oblivious to it. Many many of these exist, and they can get away with authoritarian control, abuse, demand money, get rich off these naive people, and do what they want, because theres no way to get rid of that "pastor". It's is prevalent in Black communities, snd msny Charismstic ones [masqurading as baptist or non denom]. Its a key reason why being 'of' a denominations matters(!). There's accountability.
As to other "churches" that are non denom, they stand for nothing. Yes they likely hold to the essentials of Christianity, which puts them inside Christianity. Unity with them. But they dont say what their beliefs/teachings on secondary matters are...and that's deceptive. They either 1. hide it and teach it, or 2. they dont teach on any of those topics... which keeps their congregation in immature levels where they never grow. No one is guiding nor disciplining them. Theyre perpetually infants. And in many, they embrace unbiblical aspects of the pagan culture around them, due to lack of good shepherds. It might be intentional by the church, to just have zombie sheep who fork over money, or to capitulte to the culture outside the church. The church is to be for believers to guide into holy living, to train up and equip them... nit to bring unsaved folk inside.
We likewise shouldn't run away and hide from culture/world around us, which IFB, Mennonite and Amish folk do. We are in the world not of it. We are to influence it, to engage the people in that culture, living holy and sharing biblical truths & Gospel. Influencing it with godly morals & for the good of the community, city, state, nation.
Yes community in the congregation is important, but hiding from the world isnt. We wirk there, we buy things there, we walk and live among the lost, and minister to them.
On legalism. Avoiding groups that focus on it cant be stated more importantly. It creates cults, or cult control.
When Christians talk about legalism, they usually mean turning human rules or traditions into spiritual requirements—especially when those rules start to determine whether someone is considered a “good Christian” or even saved. This concern is sometimes raised about parts of the Independent Fundamentalist Baptist movement (IFB), though it does not apply equally to every IFB church.
Below is a clearer explanation of how legalism develops and why many Christians see it as spiritually dangerous.
1. The Core Christian Teaching: Freedom in Christ
Most Protestant Christians believe the The Bible teaches that salvation and acceptance with God come through faith in Christ, not through rule-keeping.
Key passages often cited:
• Ephesians 2:8–9 – salvation is by grace through faith
• Galatians 5:1 – “For freedom Christ has set us free”
• Colossians 2:20–23 – warning against man-made religious rules
The idea is:
• Christians pursue holiness
• but rules do not save or make someone righteous
Holiness flows from salvation, not toward salvation.
2. How Legalism Usually Starts
Legalism rarely starts with bad intentions.
Often the process looks like this:
• A biblical principle exists
Example: modesty, avoiding sinful influences.
• A practical rule is created to apply it
Example: women must wear skirts, avoid certain music, etc.
• The rule becomes the standard of spirituality
At that point people may begin thinking:
“If someone doesn’t follow this rule, they must be worldly or unspiritual.”
3. When It Becomes a Serious Problem
Legalism becomes spiritually harmful when man-made rules become moral tests.
For example, a church might begin implying that a real Christian must:
• only use the King James Version of the The Bible
• avoid all secular music
• follow strict dress codes
• avoid movies or television
• follow specific courtship systems
If these are treated as biblical commands, critics say the church is adding requirements God did not give.
4. When Legalism Gets Tied to Salvation
This is the point where many Christians become most concerned.
Even if a church says salvation is by faith, legalism can creep in subtly.
It can sound like:
• “Real Christians wouldn’t do that.”
• “If someone truly loved God, they would follow these rules.”
• “People who don’t live this way probably aren’t saved.”
•
When this happens, behavior becomes the proof of salvation instead of faith in Christ.
The problem is that it can shift the focus from the gospel to external conformity.
5. The Spiritual Effects Legalism Can Cause
Many former members of very strict churches say legalism often produces unhealthy spiritual results.
Common effects include:
1. Performance Christianity
People start believing God accepts them based on how well they follow rules.
2. Judgment of Others
Christians begin measuring spirituality by external behavior rather than the heart.
3. Hidden Sin
Because strict rules define holiness, people may hide struggles rather than seek help.
4. Loss of Joy and Freedom
The Christian life begins to feel like constant rule-keeping rather than a relationship with Christ.
6. The Balance Most Christians Aim For
Most pastors try to maintain two truths at the same time.
1. Christians pursue holiness.
The The Bible clearly calls believers to live differently.
2. Holiness is not produced by man-made rules.
It comes from the work of the Holy Spirit and personal conviction.
So the goal is:
• biblical standards
• without extra laws that replace the gospel
✅ Simple summary
Legalism becomes a problem when:
• human rules are treated like God’s commands
• those rules determine who is “spiritual”
• people feel they must follow them to prove salvation
• the focus shifts from grace in Christ to rule-keeping
That’s why many Christians stress freedom in Christ together with genuine holiness. It is between the person and Christ.
Conflicts these unbiblical forced standards cause.
In many Independent Fundamentalist Baptist (IFB) churches, cultural and behavioral conformity is strongly emphasized. While every IFB church is independent, there are common patterns in how members might react if a visitor or potential dating partner doesn’t “look or act” like them.
Here’s a careful breakdown:
1. Initial Reactions to a “Different” Christian Visitor
Typical IFB mindset:
• Churches value separation from worldly influence
• Visitors are often subtly [jusged] evaluated for:
• Dress and appearance (modesty, gender norms)
• Speech and mannerisms
• Musical or entertainment preferences
• Family background (church attendance, homeschooling, values.
Common reactions:
• Curiosity and caution – People may ask questions about your background, schooling, or church.
• Friendly but guarded – Members might be polite but watchful for “worldly influences.”
• Subtle pressure to conform – Suggestions like “You might want to dress more modestly” or “We do things this way here.”
This isn’t necessarily hostile, but it can feel judgmental or exclusionary. It isnt loving, nor allowing Freddie in the body if Christ. They want to chsnge you, like judaisers did early Christians.
Imo any leader or church holding to those legalistic requirements and rules might not actually be saved, and so they spiritually manipulate congregants, [like Satan "puppetering" the leaders there].
I cant emphasize how important it is to avoid IFB and find a biblical church, and a godly man there; who pursues and lives in biblical love and faith, in the "freedoms given in Christ" to believers. God will guide you to one, even if not at the church.
You can pursue a journey to Christ and live as a Christian without him. Solid Bible churches can disciple you on the basics of the faith from Scripture, and help answer your questions as you grow in the Faith. Start there. Likewise the below can too, as a addition to that. 😊
Hope that helps.
Related
The Gospel we recieve that saves
Women topics in Scripture to guide
A: I recommend Cautions on IFB Church and its members.
Does his church [and himself] strongly "criticize" or do they "embrace" Gothard’s teachings? If they reject his teachings, that's better. If they embrace it... run! Thats still nor a simple cut and dry situation though, cuz many IFB churches embrace it, and IFB has concerning cult like issues.
The problems with IFB... well... to understand we have to look at a few things, to help bring counsel, guidance & clarity to the issue, in your sitiation. Please go through and understsnd these things well, and the resources below too. And after, please pray about it well, seeking God's guidance before you make a decision. A form of love towards someone doesnt mean theyre the right person for you. God may have had them in your life temporarily to lead you back or to Christianity. Not to tie you to "him".
False teachings of IBLP are closely connected to the Independent Fundamentalist Baptist (IFB) world, but they are not the same thing. Yet usually do get tied together, (between the two, to one another, by both groups). It def traps women in those churches, and leads to many problems including abuse, lamemt, loss of Christian faith, hopelessness, etc.
We need to look at the clear relationship, before discussing IFB, cultists issues, and whether you should pursue or end the relationship.
1. What Independent Fundamentalist Baptists (IFB) Are.
Independent Fundamentalist Baptist movement refers to a loose network of Baptist churches that emphasize:
• Independence from denominations
• Literal interpretation of The Bible
• Conservative theology
• Evangelism and personal salvation
• Often focuses on and doesnt allow reading if any other version but the King James Version of the Bible
Key traits:
• Each church is autonomous
• There is no central authority
• Pastors run their own churches
• Beliefs can vary widely
Some IFB churches are simply very conservative Baptists, while others can be extremely strict or authoritarian.
2. What IBLP Is
The Institute in Basic Life Principles (IBLP) is a parachurch ministry founded by Bill Gothard.
A parachurch organization means:
• It is not a church
• It operates alongside churches
• People from different denominations can join
IBLP provided:
• seminars
• homeschooling programs
• training materials
• youth programs like Advanced Training Institute (ATI)
*Which teaches their wonky views.
Many IFB families joined these programs. And it really messes up families, faith, brings distress and suffering.
3. Why People associate IFB with IBLP
->>>They overlap culturally. 🙁
Many followers of IBLP came from:
• IFB churches
• IFB & similar homeschooling families
Examples include the Duggar family who became famous on 19 Kids and Counting.
○Nothing wrong with homeschooling, or godly families.
Even though:
• Many IFB churches are not part of IBLP
• Some IFB pastors strongly criticize Gothard’s teachings.
... You dont really know which IFB churches are tied to Gothard's teachings. And might find yourself in one unaware.
4. Why Christians Criticize Both groups (but Differently)
They usually raise two separate concerns.
With IBLP
They argue it adds extra-biblical systems, such as:
• “umbrella of authority”
• spiritual formulas for success
• generational curse ideas [it is total nonsense]
With Some IFB Churches
The criticism is usually:
• legalism [the opposite of Grace].
• strict cultural rules treated like doctrine
• sometimes authoritarian pastors
But again — this varies widely among IFB churches.
5. Key Difference in One Sentence
IFB = a broad type of Baptist church movement.
IBLP = a teaching ministry that heavily influences many IFB churches & families.
While Not all IFB are IBLB, many IBLP followers come from IFB churches. And those churches embrace those teachings.
✅ A helpful comparison
💥But a big issue for you... if your fiance is headed into a IFB church, or is of it.... your husband is the home/family/marriage leader, who by it, can lead you astray, even into church abuse, or become abusive and it be allowed by the church. Even if hes not like that now, if hes drawn to or in further to those teachings (by men "discipling" him in it). Even if you move and go to another IFB church. It might only be a Gothard type "church" in the area, and he refuses to go anywhere else. He then pulls you both into a cult like church, cuz hes not compromising nor looking out for the best for your family (including kids) as spiritual leader hes plunged you all into danger, long term, and doesnt care how it affects you, cuz he thinks wrongly about his position in the home. Hes convinced (and his church convinced him) hes doing right. :/
A Christian should be fine with going to any [true] Christian church; Baptist, Southern Baptist, Reformed Baptist, GCC, conservative Protestant, Evangelical etc. If he is adamant to not go anywhere else, and only read KJV only... those are big red flags. As is an embracing Gothard teachings.
*You can look up videos on the Duggar daughters who married solid Christian men, who then helped them untangle the false teachings of IBF and IBLP, which helped free them spiritually and mentally from the falsehoods. It only worked cuz they marrued godly men, (and were not men marrying women). It is best not to go into "churches" with those falsehoods to begin with(!)
Lets look more.
Below are some of the reasons solid Bible focused pastors & Christians denounce Bill Gothard and the Institute in Basic Life Principles (IBLP) - as it is a departed from normal Christian doctrine.
1. Authority and “Spiritual Protection”
Christian Teaching:
• A Christian’s ultimate authority is God and Scripture (the The Bible).
• Church leaders and parents have authority, but it is limited and accountable.
• Every believer has direct access to God through Christ.
Verses often cited:
• 1 Timothy 2:5 — Christ is the mediator
• Acts 5:29 — obey God rather than men
Gothard Teaching:
Gothard promoted the “umbrella of authority” system.
✅ A helpful comparison
💥But a big issue for you... if your fiance is headed into a IFB church, or is of it.... your husband is the home/family/marriage leader, who by it, can lead you astray, even into church abuse, or become abusive and it be allowed by the church. Even if hes not like that now, if hes drawn to or in further to those teachings (by men "discipling" him in it). Even if you move and go to another IFB church. It might only be a Gothard type "church" in the area, and he refuses to go anywhere else. He then pulls you both into a cult like church, cuz hes not compromising nor looking out for the best for your family (including kids) as spiritual leader hes plunged you all into danger, long term, and doesnt care how it affects you, cuz he thinks wrongly about his position in the home. Hes convinced (and his church convinced him) hes doing right. :/
A Christian should be fine with going to any [true] Christian church; Baptist, Southern Baptist, Reformed Baptist, GCC, conservative Protestant, Evangelical etc. If he is adamant to not go anywhere else, and only read KJV only... those are big red flags. As is an embracing Gothard teachings.
*You can look up videos on the Duggar daughters who married solid Christian men, who then helped them untangle the false teachings of IBF and IBLP, which helped free them spiritually and mentally from the falsehoods. It only worked cuz they marrued godly men, (and were not men marrying women). It is best not to go into "churches" with those falsehoods to begin with(!)
Lets look more.
Below are some of the reasons solid Bible focused pastors & Christians denounce Bill Gothard and the Institute in Basic Life Principles (IBLP) - as it is a departed from normal Christian doctrine.
1. Authority and “Spiritual Protection”
Christian Teaching:
• A Christian’s ultimate authority is God and Scripture (the The Bible).
• Church leaders and parents have authority, but it is limited and accountable.
• Every believer has direct access to God through Christ.
Verses often cited:
• 1 Timothy 2:5 — Christ is the mediator
• Acts 5:29 — obey God rather than men
Gothard Teaching:
Gothard promoted the “umbrella of authority” system.
The teaching says:
• God gives protection only under authority
• If you step outside authority (parents, husband, pastor), you lose protection
• Even if the authority is wrong, you should remain under it.
Why Christians Criticize This
Pastors say:
• The Bible never teaches a spiritual protection hierarchy like this
• It can allow leaders to control people or discourage questioning
• It can keep victims under abusive authority
2. Grace vs Rule Systems.
Christian Teaching:
The gospel says salvation and growth come through grace.
Key verses often cited:
• Ephesians 2:8-9 — saved by grace through faith
• Galatians — warning against legalism
Christians may follow moral standards, but they do not believe rules earn spiritual blessing.
Gothard Teaching
IBLP promoted what Gothard called “Basic Life Principles.”
The gospel says salvation and growth come through grace.
Key verses often cited:
• Ephesians 2:8-9 — saved by grace through faith
• Galatians — warning against legalism
Christians may follow moral standards, but they do not believe rules earn spiritual blessing.
Gothard Teaching
IBLP promoted what Gothard called “Basic Life Principles.”
Examples included rules about:
• clothing and modesty
• music styles
• homeschooling
• dating vs courtship
• authority structures
• avoiding certain cultural influences
These were often presented as universal biblical principles. 😬
Accurate Criticism
Critics of it say it can turn Christianity into a formula:
Obey the principles → God will bless you
Break them → God will punish you
Many pastors say this confuses the gospel with behavior management.
3. Cause of Suffering
Christian Teaching
The Bible teaches suffering can happen for many reasons:
• living in a fallen world
• persecution
• God’s purposes we don’t understand
Example:
• Job shows suffering that was not caused by personal sin.
Gothard Teaching
Gothard frequently taught that problems like:
• illness
• financial hardship
• family problems
might come from:
• hidden sin
• generational sin [baloney]
• failure to follow biblical principles
Why Christians Rightly Criticize this
It:
• can lead to blaming victims
• oversimplifies suffering
• contradicts many biblical examples
• cause much suffering and turmoil
4. Handling of Abuse.
Christian Teaching:
Most churches today teach:
• abuse is sin and crime
• victims should be protected
• the church shepherds/counselors should be involved.
• [If necessary] authorities should be involved
Based partly on Romans 13, which teaches that governments punish wrongdoing.
And based in Scriptures teaching of handling sin (like abuse/crume) in the church.
It cant be handled biblically by shepherds nor rightly by government involvement if abuse and crime happen in a cult like church.
Gothard-Influenced Practice
Former members claim that in some IBLP circles:
• abuse was handled internally (by their rules)
• victims were encouraged to forgive and submit (even if it was wrong & repentance and correction if the offender wasnt genuine, nor required by leadership).
• reporting to police was discouraged (cuz it sheds light on abuse in that church, and i5 doesn't protect men who are abusers... it gets dealt with).
These issues became widely discussed after the scandals involving Josh Duggar, whose family appeared on 19 Kids and Counting. While decent people are trying to live life biblically, they made errors or followed IFB or Gothard methods, it failed cuz they were following false/bad leaders from within that sect on how to deal with it. It wasnt based on biblical methods and biblical counseling. Also, not everyone who claims to be saved, is. Some degenerate people are false converts who can decieve into adulthood, play along (religion) in cult like groups, until it gets exposed, as it did in Josh's case. We prayed he genuinely gets saved. And God uses this and the sisters departure from IFB & Gothard teachings into biblical Christianity, as testimony of God's transforming power, and with hope that many ithers trapped in that cult like sect flee it, while helping prevent others from joining it.
5. Leadership Structure
Christian Teaching:
Most churches use shared leadership, such as:
• elders
• pastors
• church accountability
Leaders are not supposed to be unquestionable.
Gothard Teaching:
IBLP functioned largely under the authority of Bill Gothard himself.
Critics say:
• his teachings were treated as authoritative interpretations
• questioning the system was discouraged
• there was little accountability
If churches held to that teaching, there is no leway nor hope for congregant women, nor hope for justice & true restoration, nor to correction to biblical values in ither areas.
Why Many Regard it as a Cult or “Cult-Like”
Many Christians hesitate to call it a full cult because followers still believe basic Christian doctrines (God, Jesus, salvation).
However, critics say the system had cult-like traits, such as:
• strong authority control
• extra-biblical teachings
• isolation from outside influence
• heavy loyalty to a leader
Are enough to label it a cult.
✅ Short summary
Christian teaching:
• Scripture alone is the final authority
• Salvation and blessing come through grace
• Leaders are accountable
• Suffering isn’t always caused by sin
You might say wait the umbrella image looks biblical 🤔. The Left side.
That’s a very good observation — and this is exactly where the debate happens among Christians. Many people see Gothard’s chart and think “that looks biblical.” The issue critics raise is not that authority exists, but how Gothard defined and applied it.
Let’s compare carefully.
1. Authority in the Bible (Christian Teaching)
Christians broadly agree the The Bible teaches real authority structures.
Examples often cited:
• Family authority
• Ephesians 5–6
• Husbands lead families, parents guide children.
• Church leadership
• Hebrews 13:17 — respect church leaders.
• Government authority
• Romans 13 — civil authorities have God-given roles.
So Christians do believe authority exists.
2. What Gothard Added
The issue Christian critics rightly raise is the specific doctrine created by Bill Gothard through the Institute in Basic Life Principles.
Gothard’s teaching went further than normal Christian doctrine in several ways:
1️⃣ Protection depends on staying under authority
Gothard taught that if someone leaves their authority (father, husband, pastor), they leave God’s “umbrella of protection.”
Many pastors say the Bible never teaches spiritual protection works like a chain of command.
2️⃣ Submission even when authority is wrong
Gothard often taught that:
• Even if an authority is unfair or sinful, a person should remain under them.
Critics point out that the Bible gives limits to authority.
Example:
• Acts 5:29
“We must obey God rather than men.”
So Christian teaching generally says:
• submit to authority unless it requires sin.
3️⃣ Direct relationship with God
Christian theology emphasizes that believers relate to God directly through Christ.
Example:
• 1 Timothy 2:5 — Jesus is the mediator.
Critics say Gothard’s system can function like a spiritual chain of intermediaries.
3. Where Gothard Is Biblical
To be fair, some parts of the idea do come from Scripture, such as:
• respecting parents
• honoring leaders
• family structure
• discipline and order
That’s why the teaching seems convincing to many Christians at first.
4. Where Christians Say, No It Goes Too Far
Many pastors say the diagram oversimplifies and exaggerates biblical authority.
Problems they highlight:
• it turns authority into a spiritual protection system
• it discourages questioning leaders
• it can trap people under abusive authority
• it implies God’s protection comes through humans rather than directly from God
5. A Simple Comparison
Image
✅ In short:
Many Christians agree that authority is biblical, but they argue Gothard turned it into a rigid spiritual system the Bible doesn’t actually teach.
If you want, I can also show you something interesting: how Gothard’s umbrella teaching actually differs from the historic teachings of Baptists, Reformed churches, and even early Christians. It’s a subtle difference but really important.
====
On legalism issues
The accusation of “legalism” toward the Independent Fundamentalist Baptist movement (IFB) usually comes from Christians who believe some IFB churches turn personal standards into spiritual requirements. Not every IFB church does this, but critics say it happens often enough to be a common concern (of that denomination).
Below is the typical Christian critique of IFB legalism.
1. What Christians Mean by “Legalism”
In Christian theology, legalism means adding human rules to God’s commands or implying that keeping those rules makes someone more righteous before God.
The concern usually comes from passages like:
• Galatians — warning against adding requirements to the gospel
• Colossians 2:20–23 — warning about man-made religious rules
Christians across many traditions agree that salvation comes through grace, not rule-keeping.
2. Typical Rules in Some IFB Churches
Many IFB churches promote strict lifestyle standards meant to encourage holiness. But its required, not a freedom in Christ choice.
Common examples:
Appearance
• men must have short hair
• women should not cut their hair
• women should wear skirts or dresses only
Entertainment
• no secular music
• no movie theaters
• strict limits on television or internet
Alcohol
• total abstinence (even though the Bible mainly condemns drunkenness)
Dating
• strict courtship systems
•
Bible translation
• insistence on the King James Version as the only legitimate English Bible
○ which is total nonsense.
* tbvh the Christian Bible of Protestants was the Geneva Bible. KJV was Catholic. Well he cut away from Carholicidm at some point snd created Anglicanism, but its mostly heavily Catholic (even to today). We only had KJV overtake Geneva ver in US cuz when British came here (after Puritans and pilgrams), they imposed British laws b4 our Independence. Only KJV was allowed to be bought, and the crown made it so cheap people started buying it over Geneva. Not by choice. Today's KJVOnly cultists dont even know this, nor how much better modern translations are (like LSB21 and NASB95).
3. Why Christians Criticize Their rules as Legalism.
Rule → Spiritual Judgment
Critics say the problem arises when these preferences become moral tests.
Example criticism:
A Christian who drinks a glass of wine or listens to contemporary music might be treated as spiritually compromised.
○ The Bible does not explicitly forbid those things.
○the church might wrongly discipline them.
Culture vs Command
Many pastors argue some IFB rules come from mid-20th-century American culture, not biblical commands.
For example:
• movie theaters were historically associated with immoral films
• certain music styles were linked to rebellion.
They often cite and misuse verses, twisting context and purpose, like:
○2 Corinthians 6:17 — “come out from among them and be separate”.
1 Thessalonians 5:22 — avoid the ○appearance of evil.
Critics say those cultural concerns became permanent religious rules. Not guides. Not calls to consider sin in your life, but strict required adherence to it.
4. Important: IFB Is Not One Group
Because IFB churches are independent:
• some are very strict
• some are moderately conservative
• some are nearly indistinguishable from other Baptist churches
There is no central authority controlling them. This is problematic.
On IFB Pastors (hierarchy)
They have similarities to other Baptist churches.
Independant churches, like many Southern Baptists & other independent churches, just as Non Denomination churches, have a single pastor. It is actually not good to have that leadership. Ill explain in a minute. All these churches have either one pastor and under him are decons who serve the church. Some have a Senior and Associate pastor with Decons also.
Two issues here
1. Scripture calls for a plurality of elders. Who are elders? They are pastors.
Yes some SBC churches have a Senior pastor and associate pastor. They might have a youth pastor, Evangelism pastor, etc. But there should be a plurality.
The reason it didn't work in many churches in US, is church averages were 30 to 75 people. Even less in the early wild west (and earlier). They cant afford 3 or 5 paid pastors. But as towns grow, as cities form, small likeminded churches should have merged into larger 4k member churches. And have multiple elders. They haven't done that in modern times. And pastors should be trained up from within the church, not be some college graduate who just gets hired. They know hardly nothing about the pastor nor his past. But if he grew up in the church, they know a ton about him, intimately know him, his character, his faith growth, his beliefs, his sins & flaws, his trustworthiness & integrity. This is the failing of independent churches. The leaders, esp pastor, wants a position with power and praise. Not to be submitted to God and faithfully shepherd & transparently.
2. What happens when theres only 1 pastor? A. In weak churches (or ones with small numbers, that need a pastor & cling to him cuz they have a hard time finding one) the church might cater to him instead of hold him equally accountable (to a holy life & to integrity as pastor). If multiple pastors are not at the church, he can do what he wants, live in sin, wrongly judge others, abuse of power and abuse congregants. Many pastors today are not evrn saved. And of the pastors in churches only 34% say they agree the Bible is the Authority in all areas of life and Faith. So if the 66% of the rest don't, they dont teach Scripture authoritatively! Which means they inject their own idolatrous views in what they preach and teach. And if its a one man show... theres no one to also hold that pastor accountable to biblical orthodoxy. This is the big problem of independant churches.
At least with SBC (which isnt actually a denomination, theyre independent churches), they hold to a set of agreed to biblical truths, and those are expected to be taught. If not the church can vote to fire the pastor, and if a weak church, that clings to that pastor anyway, SBC can boot them out. Disassociate with, publicly spotlight them, expose snd warn people to have nothung to do with them. All associations they had together are immediately cut off. No nearby SBC churches nor state SBC churches will do anything with them in any way anymore [incl, Evangelism, children activities, fellowships, conferences, moral connections in political or culture areas like pregnancy crisis centers etc) cuz they've left biblical truth. We wont tie light to darkness.
B. For the churches that arent weak, they will fire a solo pastor.
C. But if the "church" claims to be Christian, like some so called "non denom" church, even ones created by one guy... he "owns" the building, (who also might give his wife some title in the church that she has no right to, biblically), who started a church as a business but the congregants are oblivious to it. Many many of these exist, and they can get away with authoritarian control, abuse, demand money, get rich off these naive people, and do what they want, because theres no way to get rid of that "pastor". It's is prevalent in Black communities, snd msny Charismstic ones [masqurading as baptist or non denom]. Its a key reason why being 'of' a denominations matters(!). There's accountability.
As to other "churches" that are non denom, they stand for nothing. Yes they likely hold to the essentials of Christianity, which puts them inside Christianity. Unity with them. But they dont say what their beliefs/teachings on secondary matters are...and that's deceptive. They either 1. hide it and teach it, or 2. they dont teach on any of those topics... which keeps their congregation in immature levels where they never grow. No one is guiding nor disciplining them. Theyre perpetually infants. And in many, they embrace unbiblical aspects of the pagan culture around them, due to lack of good shepherds. It might be intentional by the church, to just have zombie sheep who fork over money, or to capitulte to the culture outside the church. The church is to be for believers to guide into holy living, to train up and equip them... nit to bring unsaved folk inside.
We likewise shouldn't run away and hide from culture/world around us, which IFB, Mennonite and Amish folk do. We are in the world not of it. We are to influence it, to engage the people in that culture, living holy and sharing biblical truths & Gospel. Influencing it with godly morals & for the good of the community, city, state, nation.
Yes community in the congregation is important, but hiding from the world isnt. We wirk there, we buy things there, we walk and live among the lost, and minister to them.
On legalism. Avoiding groups that focus on it cant be stated more importantly. It creates cults, or cult control.
When Christians talk about legalism, they usually mean turning human rules or traditions into spiritual requirements—especially when those rules start to determine whether someone is considered a “good Christian” or even saved. This concern is sometimes raised about parts of the Independent Fundamentalist Baptist movement (IFB), though it does not apply equally to every IFB church.
Below is a clearer explanation of how legalism develops and why many Christians see it as spiritually dangerous.
1. The Core Christian Teaching: Freedom in Christ
Most Protestant Christians believe the The Bible teaches that salvation and acceptance with God come through faith in Christ, not through rule-keeping.
Key passages often cited:
• Ephesians 2:8–9 – salvation is by grace through faith
• Galatians 5:1 – “For freedom Christ has set us free”
• Colossians 2:20–23 – warning against man-made religious rules
The idea is:
• Christians pursue holiness
• but rules do not save or make someone righteous
Holiness flows from salvation, not toward salvation.
2. How Legalism Usually Starts
Legalism rarely starts with bad intentions.
Often the process looks like this:
• A biblical principle exists
Example: modesty, avoiding sinful influences.
• A practical rule is created to apply it
Example: women must wear skirts, avoid certain music, etc.
• The rule becomes the standard of spirituality
At that point people may begin thinking:
“If someone doesn’t follow this rule, they must be worldly or unspiritual.”
3. When It Becomes a Serious Problem
Legalism becomes spiritually harmful when man-made rules become moral tests.
For example, a church might begin implying that a real Christian must:
• only use the King James Version of the The Bible
• avoid all secular music
• follow strict dress codes
• avoid movies or television
• follow specific courtship systems
If these are treated as biblical commands, critics say the church is adding requirements God did not give.
4. When Legalism Gets Tied to Salvation
This is the point where many Christians become most concerned.
Even if a church says salvation is by faith, legalism can creep in subtly.
It can sound like:
• “Real Christians wouldn’t do that.”
• “If someone truly loved God, they would follow these rules.”
• “People who don’t live this way probably aren’t saved.”
•
When this happens, behavior becomes the proof of salvation instead of faith in Christ.
The problem is that it can shift the focus from the gospel to external conformity.
5. The Spiritual Effects Legalism Can Cause
Many former members of very strict churches say legalism often produces unhealthy spiritual results.
Common effects include:
1. Performance Christianity
People start believing God accepts them based on how well they follow rules.
2. Judgment of Others
Christians begin measuring spirituality by external behavior rather than the heart.
3. Hidden Sin
Because strict rules define holiness, people may hide struggles rather than seek help.
4. Loss of Joy and Freedom
The Christian life begins to feel like constant rule-keeping rather than a relationship with Christ.
6. The Balance Most Christians Aim For
Most pastors try to maintain two truths at the same time.
1. Christians pursue holiness.
The The Bible clearly calls believers to live differently.
2. Holiness is not produced by man-made rules.
It comes from the work of the Holy Spirit and personal conviction.
So the goal is:
• biblical standards
• without extra laws that replace the gospel
✅ Simple summary
Legalism becomes a problem when:
• human rules are treated like God’s commands
• those rules determine who is “spiritual”
• people feel they must follow them to prove salvation
• the focus shifts from grace in Christ to rule-keeping
That’s why many Christians stress freedom in Christ together with genuine holiness. It is between the person and Christ.
Conflicts these unbiblical forced standards cause.
In many Independent Fundamentalist Baptist (IFB) churches, cultural and behavioral conformity is strongly emphasized. While every IFB church is independent, there are common patterns in how members might react if a visitor or potential dating partner doesn’t “look or act” like them.
Here’s a careful breakdown:
1. Initial Reactions to a “Different” Christian Visitor
Typical IFB mindset:
• Churches value separation from worldly influence
• Visitors are often subtly [jusged] evaluated for:
• Dress and appearance (modesty, gender norms)
• Speech and mannerisms
• Musical or entertainment preferences
• Family background (church attendance, homeschooling, values.
Common reactions:
• Curiosity and caution – People may ask questions about your background, schooling, or church.
• Friendly but guarded – Members might be polite but watchful for “worldly influences.”
• Subtle pressure to conform – Suggestions like “You might want to dress more modestly” or “We do things this way here.”
This isn’t necessarily hostile, but it can feel judgmental or exclusionary. It isnt loving, nor allowing Freddie in the body if Christ. They want to chsnge you, like judaisers did early Christians.
They def will want you to comply if you stay. If not you will be ostricized, which isnt what Christians should do.
2. Reaction to Dating Outside the Norm
Many IFB churches have strict courtship rules:
• Typically, dating as commonly practiced is discouraged or forbidden
• Courtship is often supervised by family or church leaders
• Rules emphasize:
• Spiritual compatibility
• Shared cultural values (homeschooling, modesty, lifestyle)
• Family approval
Implications for someone “different”:
• You might be discouraged from dating someone outside the church or family-approved circles.
• If a person does begin a relationship with someone who doesn’t fit the IFB cultural mold, leaders or parents may warn against it, sometimes strongly.
• Some churches may view a mismatch as spiritually risky, based on the principle of “don’t be unequally yoked” (2 Corinthians 6:14).
3. Underlying Beliefs Behind This Reaction
• Separation from worldly influence:
• IFB churches often teach that Christian character is maintained by living apart from secular culture.
• Cultural conformity as spiritual safety:
• “Looking like us, acting like us” is often interpreted as a marker of spiritual maturity or obedience.
• Concern for family and community reputation:
• Members may fear that “different” behaviors could undermine the church’s values or lead others astray.
4. How a Visitor Might Experience It
• Positive: You may be welcomed, taught, and encouraged to learn IFB ways.
• Neutral: Members are polite but may avoid deeper connection until they see conformity.
• Negative: You may face subtle or direct disapproval if your lifestyle or appearance doesn’t fit their standards.
5. How This Differs From good Christian Churches & denominations
• Mainstream Protestant or evangelical churches usually:
• Accept diversity of appearance, dress, and cultural background
• Focus on relationships primarily based on faith in Christ, not lifestyle conformity
• Allow dating based on personal conviction, spiritual compatibility, and mutual consent rather than strict supervision; though you can ask for and be guided.
• IFB churches wrongly link visible lifestyle and cultural conformity with spiritual health, which is why they may react more critically.
Learn from History
Jews did this with their legalism. They were apostate not having true faith, but in their unrighteoudness, wanting to appear holy or higher or more mature than others, they twisted Scripture, added burdens to the people. Being blind to the Law and to holiness, they thought things were to be external, and were shocked when Jesus exposed them. He showed them God knew their thoughts [and 😉 he further showed He is God by addressing their thoughts]. He called them white washed tombs, appearing clean and righteous on the outside [as all false religions do] while inside are dead bones. Spiritually dead, with filthy dirty inner man. In Jesus time and since, Jews went to extreme lengths to make it appear they were kerping the Law, so much that they added 40k more laws to try to prevent outwardly committing any of the 10! Thats what false religions do. They impose what God hasn't required. And... holy living comes from natural outflow of a person's inner man being transformed by God through salvation in Jesus. Everyone grows and matures at their own level. And God uses all those flaws and where they are (infants in faith, growng, maturing, matured, well matured) to accomplish things around them, and in them. Churches like IFB/Charismatics, to try to thwart that (work of God) based on man made imposed legalism. It should be rejected, and freedom given. To the individual and their family. Not ruled and determined by a pastor or denomination trying to control people. If saved, pursuing holiness is s natural outflow of the converted heart.
So never tie yourself to a church or group that imposes unbiblical rules, and do so at the cost of freedom in Christ. They are not fit to be shepherds, nor to have followers under their care. Theyre not being like Christ to the Church. Theyre usurping their role in the body as if the authoritative Head; only Christ Himself is.
Yes, dress modest, yes pursue dating or courting with a churches guidance, for godly boundaries and to help you with self control, to encourage to never be alone privately (so immoral sin can tempt you). But it needs to be cuz you are wanting to live right towards God in holiness, not cuz your leaders demand it, or force it on you.
Yes, seek their guidance, yes go to them for counseling, or to address if the suitor took sexual advantage of you [if hes in church], or raped you. Yes, ask for chaperone to help you both stay pure while on dates or in courting situations to prevent that and help with boundaries.
Thats not the IFB view. Thats the regular biblical Christian view.
As to church membership:
Some Independent Baptist churches emphasize their autonomy to such an extent that they will not accept a baptism from any other church—if a new member was baptized in another church, he must be rebaptized by the Independent Baptist church for his membership to be valid. Which is crazy cuz Bsotidm is just a visual testimony showing tou are saved. Added to the Church; the Bride of Christ. Showing you are already professing salvation. Baptism has 0 to do with the local church. They've made another false teachings part of their legslistic rules, or in total ignorance to Scripture.
If you date or marry a guy in a IFB church, you are stuck under unreasonable, unbiblical rules that are forced on you, in minute ways. It is not a denomination to join or be part of. And theyre usually small in numbers (congregants) since most will reject this within Christianity.
As to cult? Well technically they cant truly be called one since thru hold to the Gospel that saves. With their legalism can they be bordering in cult except thry hold to gospel salvation.
Yes — this is exactly how many Christian leaders describe some IFB or Gothard-influenced churches. The distinction is subtle but important: they hold to orthodox gospel salvation, yet other aspects of their system can be cult-like in practice.
Here’s a careful breakdown:
1. Core Salvation Remains Biblical
Most IFB churches teach salvation by grace through faith in Christ alone.
They affirm the Trinity, Jesus’ death and resurrection, and Scripture as authoritative.
They hold to the essentials ofvehat makes someone Christian.
✅ This is why they aren’t "actually" considered a heretical cult by most Christians.
2. Cult-Like Traits Arise from Legalism and Authority
Even while affirming the gospel, certain structural and behavioral patterns can resemble cults:
3. Why It’s Not a “Cult” Theologically
Belief in Jesus’ saving work is intact.
No new revelation or replacement gospel is taught.
Most members are sincere Christians, not deceived into false belief.
So the term “cult-like” is usually used to describe "practices and control", not core doctrine.
4. Why Legalism Makes It Cult-Like
Legalism interacts with authority in ways that can tip a group toward cult-like behavior:
1. Rules define spirituality – if you don’t follow, you’re seen as less Christian.
2. Obedience is tied to blessing or protection – makes members feel compelled to comply.
3. Community reinforces conformity – non-conforming behavior is shamed or discouraged.
This is why former members of Gothard-influenced IFB programs often describe feeling trapped or suffocated by the rules, even though they were taught the gospel correctly.
My recommendation is, if your bf/fiance is not open to going to a different conservative Christian church, then exit the relationship. You do not know whatt his beliefs might change to (esp if lured into Gothard teachings or other churches in IFB that are more cult like controlling, if you move for a job or whatever). It would be totally diff if you were the man and he was a girl, she would have to follow you to a biblical church. It doesn't work that way in your case. He would be your spiritual leader....and since he holds to the biblical Gospel, youd be stuck in what's basically a cult, where abuse can abound, both by your husband and whatever the leadership imposes on you (unbiblical church discipline, unbiblical marital demands, forgive unrightly etc).
2. Reaction to Dating Outside the Norm
Many IFB churches have strict courtship rules:
• Typically, dating as commonly practiced is discouraged or forbidden
• Courtship is often supervised by family or church leaders
• Rules emphasize:
• Spiritual compatibility
• Shared cultural values (homeschooling, modesty, lifestyle)
• Family approval
Implications for someone “different”:
• You might be discouraged from dating someone outside the church or family-approved circles.
• If a person does begin a relationship with someone who doesn’t fit the IFB cultural mold, leaders or parents may warn against it, sometimes strongly.
• Some churches may view a mismatch as spiritually risky, based on the principle of “don’t be unequally yoked” (2 Corinthians 6:14).
3. Underlying Beliefs Behind This Reaction
• Separation from worldly influence:
• IFB churches often teach that Christian character is maintained by living apart from secular culture.
• Cultural conformity as spiritual safety:
• “Looking like us, acting like us” is often interpreted as a marker of spiritual maturity or obedience.
• Concern for family and community reputation:
• Members may fear that “different” behaviors could undermine the church’s values or lead others astray.
4. How a Visitor Might Experience It
• Positive: You may be welcomed, taught, and encouraged to learn IFB ways.
• Neutral: Members are polite but may avoid deeper connection until they see conformity.
• Negative: You may face subtle or direct disapproval if your lifestyle or appearance doesn’t fit their standards.
5. How This Differs From good Christian Churches & denominations
• Mainstream Protestant or evangelical churches usually:
• Accept diversity of appearance, dress, and cultural background
• Focus on relationships primarily based on faith in Christ, not lifestyle conformity
• Allow dating based on personal conviction, spiritual compatibility, and mutual consent rather than strict supervision; though you can ask for and be guided.
• IFB churches wrongly link visible lifestyle and cultural conformity with spiritual health, which is why they may react more critically.
Learn from History
Jews did this with their legalism. They were apostate not having true faith, but in their unrighteoudness, wanting to appear holy or higher or more mature than others, they twisted Scripture, added burdens to the people. Being blind to the Law and to holiness, they thought things were to be external, and were shocked when Jesus exposed them. He showed them God knew their thoughts [and 😉 he further showed He is God by addressing their thoughts]. He called them white washed tombs, appearing clean and righteous on the outside [as all false religions do] while inside are dead bones. Spiritually dead, with filthy dirty inner man. In Jesus time and since, Jews went to extreme lengths to make it appear they were kerping the Law, so much that they added 40k more laws to try to prevent outwardly committing any of the 10! Thats what false religions do. They impose what God hasn't required. And... holy living comes from natural outflow of a person's inner man being transformed by God through salvation in Jesus. Everyone grows and matures at their own level. And God uses all those flaws and where they are (infants in faith, growng, maturing, matured, well matured) to accomplish things around them, and in them. Churches like IFB/Charismatics, to try to thwart that (work of God) based on man made imposed legalism. It should be rejected, and freedom given. To the individual and their family. Not ruled and determined by a pastor or denomination trying to control people. If saved, pursuing holiness is s natural outflow of the converted heart.
So never tie yourself to a church or group that imposes unbiblical rules, and do so at the cost of freedom in Christ. They are not fit to be shepherds, nor to have followers under their care. Theyre not being like Christ to the Church. Theyre usurping their role in the body as if the authoritative Head; only Christ Himself is.
Yes, dress modest, yes pursue dating or courting with a churches guidance, for godly boundaries and to help you with self control, to encourage to never be alone privately (so immoral sin can tempt you). But it needs to be cuz you are wanting to live right towards God in holiness, not cuz your leaders demand it, or force it on you.
Yes, seek their guidance, yes go to them for counseling, or to address if the suitor took sexual advantage of you [if hes in church], or raped you. Yes, ask for chaperone to help you both stay pure while on dates or in courting situations to prevent that and help with boundaries.
Thats not the IFB view. Thats the regular biblical Christian view.
As to church membership:
Some Independent Baptist churches emphasize their autonomy to such an extent that they will not accept a baptism from any other church—if a new member was baptized in another church, he must be rebaptized by the Independent Baptist church for his membership to be valid. Which is crazy cuz Bsotidm is just a visual testimony showing tou are saved. Added to the Church; the Bride of Christ. Showing you are already professing salvation. Baptism has 0 to do with the local church. They've made another false teachings part of their legslistic rules, or in total ignorance to Scripture.
If you date or marry a guy in a IFB church, you are stuck under unreasonable, unbiblical rules that are forced on you, in minute ways. It is not a denomination to join or be part of. And theyre usually small in numbers (congregants) since most will reject this within Christianity.
As to cult? Well technically they cant truly be called one since thru hold to the Gospel that saves. With their legalism can they be bordering in cult except thry hold to gospel salvation.
Yes — this is exactly how many Christian leaders describe some IFB or Gothard-influenced churches. The distinction is subtle but important: they hold to orthodox gospel salvation, yet other aspects of their system can be cult-like in practice.
Here’s a careful breakdown:
1. Core Salvation Remains Biblical
Most IFB churches teach salvation by grace through faith in Christ alone.
They affirm the Trinity, Jesus’ death and resurrection, and Scripture as authoritative.
They hold to the essentials ofvehat makes someone Christian.
✅ This is why they aren’t "actually" considered a heretical cult by most Christians.
2. Cult-Like Traits Arise from Legalism and Authority
Even while affirming the gospel, certain structural and behavioral patterns can resemble cults:
3. Why It’s Not a “Cult” Theologically
Belief in Jesus’ saving work is intact.
No new revelation or replacement gospel is taught.
Most members are sincere Christians, not deceived into false belief.
So the term “cult-like” is usually used to describe "practices and control", not core doctrine.
4. Why Legalism Makes It Cult-Like
Legalism interacts with authority in ways that can tip a group toward cult-like behavior:
1. Rules define spirituality – if you don’t follow, you’re seen as less Christian.
2. Obedience is tied to blessing or protection – makes members feel compelled to comply.
3. Community reinforces conformity – non-conforming behavior is shamed or discouraged.
This is why former members of Gothard-influenced IFB programs often describe feeling trapped or suffocated by the rules, even though they were taught the gospel correctly.
My recommendation is, if your bf/fiance is not open to going to a different conservative Christian church, then exit the relationship. You do not know whatt his beliefs might change to (esp if lured into Gothard teachings or other churches in IFB that are more cult like controlling, if you move for a job or whatever). It would be totally diff if you were the man and he was a girl, she would have to follow you to a biblical church. It doesn't work that way in your case. He would be your spiritual leader....and since he holds to the biblical Gospel, youd be stuck in what's basically a cult, where abuse can abound, both by your husband and whatever the leadership imposes on you (unbiblical church discipline, unbiblical marital demands, forgive unrightly etc).
Imo any leader or church holding to those legalistic requirements and rules might not actually be saved, and so they spiritually manipulate congregants, [like Satan "puppetering" the leaders there].
I cant emphasize how important it is to avoid IFB and find a biblical church, and a godly man there; who pursues and lives in biblical love and faith, in the "freedoms given in Christ" to believers. God will guide you to one, even if not at the church.
You can pursue a journey to Christ and live as a Christian without him. Solid Bible churches can disciple you on the basics of the faith from Scripture, and help answer your questions as you grow in the Faith. Start there. Likewise the below can too, as a addition to that. 😊
Hope that helps.
Related
The Gospel we recieve that saves
Women topics in Scripture to guide
(*faq answered here)
Footnote
Final note on the errors of legalism
In a similar way, as noted, when Jewish people turned from the truth and began making up legslistic rules, while holding to apostate faith, similarly Islam has done the same. Islam is a cult. They took things from the Jewish faith, folk stuff too, and things they had access to that sounded Christian (what they had access to was stuff from that apostate RCC that was being formed around the time Islam began) and they mingled those two with other things and claimed it was from Allah [their false god] by Mohamed [a guy who likely didnt even exist. Mohamed btw is a title not a petson]. It is a cult religion more aligned to Mormonism (another cult). Both have a focus on sex in their afterlife. Thats a flesh focused sin desire, not a godly eternal minded focus.
Anyway, my point is, both Judaisn and Islam had added to God's Word, like all false religions they focus on the external. Appearances of piety. Outward rituals, doings or the way they look.
In Islam they say women need to cover up. The men have no sexual self control, nor teach it, so they have to force burdens on women. First it was cover the hair, they cant let their hair fall out of the cover nor let it fall off them or they get punished, then they moved to fully cover the body, then cover the face, now its full cover even the eyes. They also say women cant go anywhere without a male relative. They cant shake mens hands nor touch anyone not their relative, therly cant drive in sime countries, and some Islamic countries since 2026 dont allow women to talk in public; at all. They erase women. They mutilate their genitals and say they're only fir having babies and serving the husband (as a slave, who can be beat fir slightest thing, and tossed away if they want to, yet the man keeps the kids). They have hinor killings too, to save face. Its absolutely horrendous. If axwoman gets raped its her fault. But husband's force their wives to work so they can be lazy. They marry many wives so they have much income. But they cant be alone without a relative with them so how can they work? In many Islamic countries if a woman works, her boss can rape her. And if she walks in public (or even within family) and though fully civered, a man can still grab and rape her. Then she is doomed. Islamic law punishes the woman for being raped, not the rapist. She gets death penalty.
All these legalistic rules spiral out of control in legslistic religions and cults. Christianity is not like them. We are different. And ko true Church should be trying to impose rules or holiness standards in that way, it turns into nonsense burdens like the Jews too with their 40k laws to prevent committing the 10. No. Christianity shows the world we are not outward focused, fake outwardly. We are different "from within". And from that flows outwardly. It isnt our appearance that is the focus, it is the righteous nature flowing outward from within, that sets us apart. Our character and nature show us authenticity livung holy lives. Lives that conquer sin and pursue righteousness of God. That have been enabled by spiritual life to live out the communicable attributes of God by the Fruit if the Spirit.
In these ways we are different. Yet the same across the world. Regardless the culture, regardless how their culture dresses (robes, dresses, hanbok, wraps, or western attire). We can find modest outfits that suit out culture, without covering head to toe like Charismatics or Islamic women. We stand apart because God separated us into holiness. True holiness. Not the counterfeit one of false religions.
What the world sees in us... is Christ.
Comments
Post a Comment